Sakura

Amara, a scope mismatch usually means a desk rejection weeks later, so catching it before you hit submit saves a lot of time. Glad one of the three suggestions clicked and the formatting followed in one go. Wishing you a smooth review process, and thanks for the kind words!

Kavya, reference lists drift out of sync with the text over a few rounds of revisions without anyone noticing, and that's exactly what the tally catches. Seeing uncited entries and missing citations next to the totals turns it into a one-pass fix. Thank you for the thoughtful review, and good luck with the submission.

Hallo Jordan, Skepsis ist bei Formatierungstools absolut berechtigt, deshalb landet bei Sakura jede Änderung als nachverfolgbare Änderung im Dokument. So können Sie Schriftarten, Abstände und Überschriften einzeln prüfen, bevor Sie etwas übernehmen. Schön, dass am Ende keine manuellen Korrekturen nötig waren. Vielen Dank!

Sakura, we have to say we love a Sakura reviewing Sakura! A DOI that no longer resolves is one of those small things a reviewer always seems to find, so swapping it before submission was a good catch. Thanks for the kind words about the citation matching.

Alice, coordinating co-authors across three institutions is hard enough without formatting threads on top, so we love that the QC report has become the thing you send around before submission. Every change and every citation issue in one document gives everyone the same picture at the same time. Thank you for sharing how you use it!

Mohamed, going line by line through author guidelines is the worst part of submitting, so we're glad to give you those hours back. Applying everything as tracked changes means you can audit each heading, caption and reference fix yourself rather than trusting a black box. Thank you for the lovely review.

Jenna, três submissões sem nenhuma devolução por formatação ou referências é um ótimo histórico. O relatório de QC foi pensado justamente para os coautores conferirem tudo antes do envio. Muito obrigado pela recomendação!

Deepa, four duplicates from different reference managers is very common in a long review article, because each tool formats the same paper slightly differently and they stop looking like duplicates. Catching those plus the two uncited entries before submission is a nice save. Thank you, and best of luck with the article!

Sarah, being particular about your own manuscript is completely reasonable, it's your name on the paper. Review mode keeps every change as a tracked suggestion until you approve it, so rejecting the reference edits you disagreed with is exactly how it's meant to be used. Thank you for the review!

Lucas, passer de plusieurs semaines de recherche à une soumission le lendemain, c'est tout l'intérêt de relier le Journal Finder directement aux règles de formatage de chaque revue. Merci pour ce retour, et bonne chance pour la relecture de votre article !